The sons of Shelah the son of Judah, and the potters who lived with the king
유다의 아들 셀라의 자손과 왕과 함께 거한 옹기장이
1 Chronicles 4:21–23: the text says, “The sons of Shelah the son of Judah: Er the father of Lecah, Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house of those who worked fine linen, of the house of Ashbea; and Jokim, and the men of Cozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. These records are ancient. These were the potters, and the inhabitants of Netaim and Gederah; they lived there with the king for his work.” Neither edition names the king. The Korean Revised Version has no names at 4:23 where WEB reads “Netaim and Gederah”: it reads 옹기장이가 되어 수풀과 산울 가운데 거하는 자로서 (who became potters and lived among plants and hedges); and it reads 4:22 이는 다 옛 기록에 의지한 것이라 (all these rest on old records).
Direct relationships 1
Open in the full graphCollected relationship evidence
Source-backed narrative relations; not independent historical verification. Legacy dates and coordinates are outside this review.
Collection & rightsSource evidence (1)
AI-assisted comparison with the cited narrative; not independent historical verification.
- 1CH 4:21–23, engwebp
21The sons of Shelah the son of Judah: Er the father of Lecah, Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house of those who worked fine linen, of the house of Ashbea;
22and Jokim, and the men of Cozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. These records are ancient.
23These were the potters, and the inhabitants of Netaim and Gederah; they lived there with the king for his work.
AI-assisted, human review pending, 2026-09-26
Machine comparison on 2026-10-07: the wording raised none of the 3 rules against the passages this entry cites. No person has read it.
All 1 relationships: AI-assisted, human review pending
-
Saraph — Took part in — The sons of Shelah the son of Judah, and the potters who lived with the king
Evidence: 1 Chronicles 4:21–23
Verses tagged with this entry
Names in the World English Bible text that carry this entry’s tag. They are carried over from the tags on the Korean Revised Version, which are matched by name inside chapters that already have collected evidence, and a verse where the English says “he” carries none. All await human review. They are a separate list from the source passages above. An empty list does not mean the entry is absent from the text.
No verse carries this tag yet.
Something looks wrong in this entry?
This prepares a report carrying the entry, what it currently says and what it cites, so a reviewer can act on it. Nothing leaves this page until you press Send; the operator alone reads what you send.
Write what looks wrong first; a report without it cannot be acted on.
This is exactly what gets copied or sent:
[Bibliadatum entry report] Entry: The sons of Shelah the son of Judah, and the potters who lived with the king (event-1ch-4-the-sons-of-shelah-and-the-potters-who-lived-with-the-king) Address: https://bibliadatum.org/en/wiki/event/1ch-4-the-sons-of-shelah-and-the-potters-who-lived-with-the-king Current wording: 1 Chronicles 4:21–23: the text says, “The sons of Shelah the son of Judah: Er the father of Lecah, Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house of those who worked fine linen, of the house of Ashbea; and Jokim, and the men of Cozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. These records are ancient. These were the potters, and the inhabitants of Netaim and Gederah; they lived there with the king for his work.” Neither edition names the king. The Korean Revised Version has no names at 4:23 where WEB reads “Netaim and Gederah”: it reads 옹기장이가 되어 수풀과 산울 가운데 거하는 자로서 (who became potters and lived among plants and hedges); and it reads 4:22 이는 다 옛 기록에 의지한 것이라 (all these rest on old records). Cited evidence: 1CH 4:21–23, engwebp Review state: ai-assisted / human-review-pending What looks wrong: (not written yet) --- This collection records what the text says and does not settle interpretation. A report about a reading that divides opinion may be registered as an unresolved issue rather than corrected.