Jeiel (the father of Gibeon)
여이엘 (기브온의 조상)
Named at 1 Chronicles 8:29 as “The father of Gibeon”: “The father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon with his firstborn son Abdon, Zur, Kish, Baal, Nadab, Gedor, Ahio, Zecher, and Mikloth, who became the father of Shimeah” (8:29–32). WEB does not name him here. The Korean Revised Version does (기브온의 조상 여이엘은 기브온에 거하였으니, Jeiel the father of Gibeon lived in Gibeon), and does not count Mikloth among his sons (미글롯은 시므아를 낳았으며, Mikloth became the father of Shimeah). 1 Chronicles 9:35 names him in both editions: “Jeiel the father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon.”
Direct relationships 3
Open in the full graphCollected relationship evidence
Source-backed narrative relations; not independent historical verification. Legacy dates and coordinates are outside this review.
Collection & rightsSource evidence (2)
AI-assisted comparison with the cited narrative; not independent historical verification.
- 1CH 8:29–32, engwebp
29The father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon
30with his firstborn son Abdon, Zur, Kish, Baal, Nadab,
31Gedor, Ahio, Zecher,
32and Mikloth, who became the father of Shimeah. They also lived with their families in Jerusalem, near their relatives.
- 1CH 9:35–38, engwebp
35Jeiel the father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon.
36His firstborn son was Abdon, then Zur, Kish, Baal, Ner, Nadab,
37Gedor, Ahio, Zechariah, and Mikloth.
38Mikloth became the father of Shimeam. They also lived with their relatives in Jerusalem, near their relatives.
AI-assisted, human review pending, 2026-09-26
Machine comparison on 2026-10-07: the wording raised none of the 3 rules against the passages this entry cites. No person has read it.
All 3 relationships: AI-assisted, human review pending
-
Jeiel (the father of Gibeon) — Spouse of — Maacah (wife of Jeiel)
Evidence: 1 Chronicles 8:29–32, 1 Chronicles 9:35–38
-
Took part in (2) — The father of Gibeon, who lived in Gibeon, with his wife Maacah and his sons, Jeiel the father of Gibeon, who lived in Gibeon, his wife Maacah, and his sons
A relationship with an event rests on the passages the event cites: each event’s page has them.
Verses tagged with this entry
Names in the World English Bible text that carry this entry’s tag. They are carried over from the tags on the Korean Revised Version, which are matched by name inside chapters that already have collected evidence, and a verse where the English says “he” carries none. All await human review. They are a separate list from the source passages above. An empty list does not mean the entry is absent from the text.
Jeiel the father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon.
Something looks wrong in this entry?
This prepares a report carrying the entry, what it currently says and what it cites, so a reviewer can act on it. The form for sending it is not open yet, so for now the report can only be copied.
Write what looks wrong first; a report without it cannot be acted on.
This is exactly what gets copied or sent:
[Bibliadatum entry report] Entry: Jeiel (the father of Gibeon) (person-jeiel-gibeon) Address: https://bibliadatum.org/en/wiki/person/jeiel-gibeon Current wording: Named at 1 Chronicles 8:29 as “The father of Gibeon”: “The father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon with his firstborn son Abdon, Zur, Kish, Baal, Nadab, Gedor, Ahio, Zecher, and Mikloth, who became the father of Shimeah” (8:29–32). WEB does not name him here. The Korean Revised Version does (기브온의 조상 여이엘은 기브온에 거하였으니, Jeiel the father of Gibeon lived in Gibeon), and does not count Mikloth among his sons (미글롯은 시므아를 낳았으며, Mikloth became the father of Shimeah). 1 Chronicles 9:35 names him in both editions: “Jeiel the father of Gibeon, whose wife’s name was Maacah, lived in Gibeon.” Cited evidence: 1CH 8:29–32, engwebp / 1CH 9:35–38, engwebp Review state: ai-assisted / human-review-pending What looks wrong: (not written yet) --- This collection records what the text says and does not settle interpretation. A report about a reading that divides opinion may be registered as an unresolved issue rather than corrected.